software - What is a "patent-granting" license? - Open Source …
2023年9月27日 · Thanks for contributing an answer to Open Source Stack Exchange! Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research! But avoid … Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers. Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
What is the difference between Open source and "Source …
2024年12月17日 · Just as the title says, I want to know the difference between Open source and "Source available" software. Literally, both the terms mean the same thing, i.e software whose source code is publicly available. But then, how can Source available software be proprietary (closed source)? Also, what are the licenses used for Source available software?
What is the difference between FOSS and FLOSS? - Open Source …
FLOSS meant Free/Libre Open Source Software, whereas FOSS would mean Free and Open Source Software. This is less clear, as FOSS may not be interpreted with freedom. If you want to accept both, you should use FLOSS. For More Info: Free Software, Open Source, FOSS, FLOSS - same same but different. Source: FLOSS and FOSS
mit - How should you put attribution into your project? - Open …
Thanks for contributing an answer to Open Source Stack Exchange! Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research! But avoid … Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers. Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Software licensing - Pre 1970's - Open Source Stack Exchange
The PAF compiler was not free software, it was just sold with the computer (probably in source form, printed in books). I believe customers could buy IBM 370 mainframes with source code of PL/1. I had the privilege to type PAF programs on an old CAB500 computer at Palais de la Découverte in the mid 1970s (as a teenager).
What's the difference between permissive and copyleft licenses?
It's important to keep in mind that non-copyleft licenses can transform from being free/open source software to non-free, non-open source software licenses, because the enforcement of the preservation of the freedoms is not in place. Consider this distribution chain, where each letter is a person, and "A" is the person who originally wrote the ...
License compatibility for proprietary software - Open Source Stack …
2022年11月25日 · Yes, you can do it, but it's hard to give an answer for all combinations; when you copy open source into your product, you have to consider each software license's requirements separately. I would recommend you first simplify your problem to the combination My Proprietary Software + Apache 2.0, and see how to satisfy the requirements of the ...
Sharing own software with a restricted group of persons
2024年12月3日 · Thanks for contributing an answer to Open Source Stack Exchange! Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research! But avoid … Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers. Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Understanding the MIT license - Open Source Stack Exchange
2022年12月21日 · To answer this question reasonably, I think we need to consider the details of how you are distributing the software. For example, if you are shipping the software in a traditional way, in a box with CDs, DVDs, documentation, etc., then one way to include the MIT license text is to print it out and include it in the documentation.
philosophy - What are the philosophical differences between open …
Therefore, every piece of software that uses NOSA as its license is open source, but not free software. Summary. To sum it up, open source means that the users have the access to the source code, but free software means that the users are free to use the code in any way they want. If something is considered as a free software, you can also use ...