Though the United States' enforcement of anti-trust principles as of late is likely better for the consumer and broader market, the latest hearing isn't the end of the case. United States v. Google LLC (1:20-cv-03010) began proceedings in October 2020 and was decided in August of this year.

Google late Friday countered a US call to sell its Chrome browser, suggesting a judge address antitrust concerns by barring the firm from making favorable treatment of its software a condition of licensing.

Google presents its own remedy proposal to address DOJ's concerns over its Chrome browser, aiming to maintain competition in the internet search market.

Google proposes remedies to avoid selling Chrome and Android, aiming to balance competition and user experience.

Google has reportedly delivered its proposal to the DOJ's suggestion for it to sell off Chrome due to anti-competitive practices. Seeing the DOJ's proposal as "extreme," Google suggests a better remedy would be to let other companies make "multiple" deals and choices available for users.

Google has proposed alternative remedies to address its antitrust violations, responding to the U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ) push for drastic measures like selling Chrome and restricting its practices favoring its search engine.